Originally Posted by DaveRobinson
No discussion needed about this phil the rules clearly state that alternative positions should neither advantage or disadvantage a shooter. It also states that the shooters card needs to be endorsed by the chief marshal. In this case why is this guys card been signed to allow this??
Your point highlights how most discussions upon disabled shooting positions stall and that is - The Chief Marshal is in no position to make medical decisions and hence in no position to determine if advantage is gained.