View Single Post
Old 10th January 2012, 09:26 PM
AndyJ's Avatar
AndyJ AndyJ is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Member of: Rivi
Location: Wirral
Posts: 149

Originally Posted by Willbe View Post
But if it is handed over to a customer, and if at a later date the cylinder failed due to bad engineering injuring that customer or a 3rd party, then this could be used legally against who carried out the modification. Just the same principle as when I calibrate say a pressure transmitter that protects a vessel from overpressurisation i will issue a calibration cert on that instrument outlining its performance during that test. Yes it is a test only on that day of testing but if something was to happen and it is found that a/ I issued the cert without performing the test or b/ carried out that test incorrectly or somewhere my method was flawed then that cert would be used as evidence against me legally, I could be in very hot water! This was my thinking about certificates being issued.
The problem with rogue/dodgy workmen is they aren't too bothered by what is law and will lie and cheat if it keeps them out of hot water. lets say you buy a cylinder off said rogue, he sells a few more makes a few quid then dissapears, yours then fails and injures someone? do you think the certificate he gave you will be any use?

This is all because the cylinder was a modified/custom job, would people now be calling for pcp's to be banned had it been a standard cylinder? the POTENTIAL is there in EVERY cylinder, how many people who think they should be banned have bought a secondhand pcp? have they all checked inside and out of the cylinder and end caps incase previous owner has been inside and damaged cylinder walls or threads?

I know every cylinder over 5 years old should be banned incase of fatigue, any cylinder thats been painted/dipped banned because we can't see the condition underneath the coating, any cylinder with sctratches banned because if outside is marked maybe inside is worse? Where does it stop?
Reply With Quote