Since when has it been any kind of offence to work on any manufacturers guns ?
If that was the case I can think of quite a few people in trouble, including myself. If he was servicing/repairing Ripley's he had the experience as he worked for them for 15 years until they finished him.
If Lee is guilty of possession of Section 1 rifles because they are fitted with adjusters are then not Ripley and others guilty of supplying Section 1 rifles under the same reasoning because they supply them with adjusters?
If you were a defendant and wanted to prove a point on the power the rifles were set at when seized how could you possibly do this if the evidence had been altered?
Last edited by raygun; 8th September 2010 at 12:15 PM.