View Single Post
Old 2nd September 2015, 03:07 PM
Waldo Waldo is online now
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Member of: B O A C, B R P C ,
Location: Bolton
Posts: 354

Originally Posted by Tench View Post
How many of the extremely knowledgeable crowd that use the FTP still have the shroud on? I am sure they didn't ask AA for that to be fitted making the rifle more expensive so they could remove it. And not just remove it for cosmetic reasons, it ruins the accuracy, so zero shifting is a feature you are paying extra for!
Yep, loads of development work went into that!

Shooting is basically like a one make race series, we are all restricted to the same velocity/energy limit, so who is going to win, the one with the best aerodynamics!
When a manufacturer actually decides to put some effort into designing and developing a rifle with the emphasis on maximising bc then they would have a product that has an advantage over those that others produce.

When you see a regged 12ft/lb rifle with a 19" barrel you know straight away that no research into maximising the ballistic coefficient took place!

I once asked a manufacturer if they had made an improvement in the bc with their new rifle, they answered with a puzzled look and a question, "that's dictated by the pellet isn't it?"

If you don't think the rifles action can influence the bc look at this graph of a shot string from an unregged pcp showing both the velocity and bc of each shot.

From the lowest to the highest bc we see an increase of about 50%, so a rifle properly developed could out perform the rest of the market by a margin everyone would want!

The graph data is not mine but I have been working on this for years and it sickens me that manufacturers tell you what you want to hear but don't go nearly as far as they could with development, its all about money!

I know this thread and some of my comments have been about the FTP but I am now talking about manufacturers in general, we just need one of them to take development seriously to produce a game changer, then the rest will have to follow!
It`s all common sense or lack of it perhaps, if manufacturers put as much thought into rifle accuracy and reliability as they seem to do to try and make a rifle look good ?, I personally am not bothered if the rifle has sexy curves or not as long as it shoot as it should and that`s what we all pay our hard earned cash for is it not? and I don`t find bits loose/ fitted incorrectly then they would make money surely ?
Reply With Quote