Originally Posted by Brian.Samson
I don't know. I suspect that they thought that the risk had become more significant, but it's anyone's guess.
The question I have is: what was the manufactures' interpretation of "capable" prior to their adoption of AT?
As I have already said, I ASSUMED that my purchase of my S200 in 2005 was completely without me having to consider any ramification of the word "capable" within the FA Act.
Furthermore, it would appear to me that anyone with an 'FAC' AA TX200HC should seriously reconsider possession of said rifle.