Originally Posted by raygun
There's enough reports on the different Boards about new rifles being supplied over power, including springers.
AT costs the manufacturers nothing.
I very much doubt that they've reduced their profit margin. We Pay.
I don't doubt that some guns are over, I'm not disputing that at all.
What I'm questioning is that AT is used to void warranty and therefore charge, my point being that there are much cheaper ways for them to do that in practice. So I think that side of the argument is a bit of a false flag really.
As everything is held with private companies and/or under NDA I've go no idea how you take this conversation forward other than one reply from the Home Office and a bloke who attended a meeting.
How do you think it should be taken forward?