Originally Posted by raygun
The only winner with AT seems to be the manufacturers. We know they are not capable of producing tested rifles that comply to the law, even with AT fitted. What they do get though is an absolvement of any liability for Warranty work when the AT is removed by concerned owners.
I'm not sure about this Ray, we don't have any numbers or data to even start backing it up plus it's an expensive way to go about protecting a warranty, I can think of a least two methods they use that would be loads cheaper that fitting in some cases 4 bits of AT.