Thread: Anti-tamper
View Single Post
Old 7th January 2015, 09:38 AM
skires skires is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 950

Has this always been to do with the law?

Nothing to do with manufacturers wanting to reduce time/costs fixing rifles returned within warranty that had been messed with by the owners ( or suspected messed with )?

Didn't Daystate make that statement? They offered the choice of non AT but buyer signed a waiver?

Was that an urban myth?

Last edited by skires; 7th January 2015 at 10:03 AM.
Reply With Quote