Thread: Anti-tamper
View Single Post
Old 6th January 2015, 03:30 PM
Yorkshiretea's Avatar
Yorkshiretea Yorkshiretea is offline
B Grade Bandit
Join Date: Aug 2013
Member of: Anston FTC
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,165

Originally Posted by raygun View Post
Where have the responsibilities of the Directors of any airgun company altered? As a Company Director you can only choose which tests and the amount of testing required to ensure compliance. That is usually a closed ending requirement to meet a particular set of legislation (ie New Approach Directive).
As a Company Director would you endorse an action that would put your customer in breach of legislation without them being able to do anything about it ? If you would I suggest that you are certainly not demonstrating a duty of care to your customer. Neither would you deserve to retain that customer..

Without supposition or superstition I can relate directly a case where an airgunner lost his rifle, was fined and received Criminal RExcord. His HW100 fitted with AT was found to be at a power level of 12.45FPE.
Link to the case?

Originally Posted by raygun View Post
I am also intrigued as to why I should care about a Company Director who has so little regard for me that he puts me in danger of prosecution without me being able to do anything about it.
If there is little danger of anyone being found with an overpower rifle then obviously there isn't a problem and AT is not required.

See again and again you don't understand the greater risk, you just keep nailing home the lesser point. I give up.
Reply With Quote