View Single Post
Old 11th November 2014, 02:38 PM
cloverleaf cloverleaf is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 117

Interesting post.. for all my inquisitive nature I'd never considered the derivation of the constant. I've unquestioningly used 450240 ever since I first read it in Airgunner () at the age of about 15

Rob; as you point out this issue arises from varying available values for gravitational acceleration; would it not be easiest to work through the SI formula converting to imperial, using the standard gravitational acceleration constant of 9.80665m/s^2..?

As you rightly point out the potential for inaccuracy from such variations is pretty small - at this point I'd start worrying more about the accuracy of my measuring equipment, rounding errors etc
Reply With Quote