Originally Posted by Conor
Technically they were visable, just not shootable so perhaps wording needs changed
I wasn't there, but I'd have thought that if the difference between shootable and not shootable was down to your scope height, in all likelihood the target wouldn't have been visible from the prone position (as it says they should be in the rules).
So perhaps you don't need a re-word if the visible from prone rule was adhered to?
Just saying like.. don't put me on any lists